On Intersections of Land, Law, and Literature, from Primitive Territories to the Post-National Future

The Medieval Combat World Championship and Nationalist Spoil-Sports (June 9, 2014)


In reading Tom Holland’s fascinating report on his visit to the First International Medieval Combat Federation World Championships, held in the Castilla de Belmonte in Spain (south of Madrid), I was mesmerized by the wonderfully hybrid time of this spectacle: even as participants experientially learn the pleasures and pains of medieval combat in a setting that Holland reads as quixotically medieval, very modern forms of nationalism seem to be structuring the events. After first giving a taste of Franco-Swedish combat, Holland moves on to what proved to be a fundamental rift in the participating community, and one which seems to be reproducing the East-West split that characterized the Cold War as much as today’s Russo-Ukrainian conflict: Russians had pulled out of the championship playoffs, marking a fundamental East-West scission in the medieval combat world.

       The spectacular nature of faux-medieval fighting has always intrigued me—and the World Championship organizers nicely highlight, in postmodern-medieval fashion, the layers of artificiality in their choice of venue: the Belmonte, an actual medieval castle, is singled out as having been the setting for the 1961 film El Cid.  Moreover, as I have discussed in terms of World Cup ethno-nationalism, I am more than a little intrigued at this juncture in time with intersections of sports and nationalism.

             What most struck me about Holland’s reporting on the East-West split within this particular medieval combat world is that Russians are apparently quite contemptuous of Americans participating, “on the grounds that the US ha[s] no medieval history”— and this, after the very same Russians deployed Soviet iconography to evidently “taunt” a Polish contingent. Much as nationalist scholars co-opted the medieval past throughout the nineteenth-century rise of university literary studies, so do these medieval combatants also, through their sport, seem, in some cases, to lay claim to an ethno-national cultural capital—and one that cannot be transported, apparently, by immigrants moving to new locations and yet retaining their stakes in heritage (of which America is surely a clear example). It amuses me how un-medieval such an attitude is, especially considering how multiethnic and unstable Arthurian empire is, as I recently discussed in the light of recent critical activity in and around Russia. Indeed, the very diversity of medieval modes of claiming inheritance in America makes it seem perhaps the most fertile area for such revival.

             On a final note, I do feel sorry for these literalist anti-American combatants on one score: if they feel that American soil does not host the requisite amount of medieval history, they will clearly probably also discount Canadian territory as a potential site for authentic faux-medieval combat, and thus never be able to bring themselves to enjoy the truly wondrous kitsch of a visit to my nearest and dearest Medieval Times.


Author: Randy P. Schiff

I am an Associate Professor of English currently at the University at Buffalo, SUNY. I specialize in Middle English literature, with special interests in alliterative verse, medieval romance, Scottish poetry, Old French poetry, Arthurian literature, ethnic identity, imperialism, nationalism, ecocriticism, courtly love, and literary history.

4 thoughts on “The Medieval Combat World Championship and Nationalist Spoil-Sports (June 9, 2014)

  1. Was wondering if the recent Documentary “The Quest For Bannockburn” really kicks of the history season in this significant year. Re-enactment of combat was a big part of it. Notable the B.B.C appear to be funding the archaeology, which was a distinctive Glasgow take with archaeologists engaging with historical texts.

    Also got Bannockburn Live to not look forward to.

    I am hoping the Gaelic take on history and identity manages to go beyond ‘we all spoke Gaelic once’ (don’t mention the British).
    Be interesting to see how the topic of historical identity is handled by all vested interests in t.v. format and a more dramatic style.

    • Dear Jeb, Thanks for your comment. I don’t know that program, but will have to look at it.
      I do agree that over-focus on Gaelic can be frustrating when dealing with models of history– especially since so much of Scotland was essentially English-speaking (or, if you see Scots or Middle Scots as its own language, at least Germanic-family-language speaking).
      I do believe it will be intriguing to see all the ethno-historical stuff heat up over this summer, before the big Independence vote in Scotland.

      • I should have said P Celtic rather than British, dyslexic sloppiness.

        I am about ten years out of date on early med identity and I don’t think the suspicions about the Scots were ever published (Anglo Saxon legal analysis was) but was a strong feeling linguistic and cultural change was related to changes of status in legal texts and an economic shift down the food chain into slavery.

        You see the same slashing in honour price in Scots law as you do in the Anglo Saxon codes for the British population.

        But it makes the claim for the spread of Gaelic in later medieval Scotland as some form of cultural historic solidarity somewhat pleasingly ironic.

  2. Pingback: Potential World Cup Fever: Sport and Sanctions (July 27, 2014) | Terri-Stories

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s